Get webhook notifications whenever Network & Infrastructure creates an incident, updates an incident, resolves an incident or changes a component status.
Suite à la mise à jour de switchs Nexus 5000
avec la derniere version 5.2.1 nous avons
rencontré pas mal de problemes aleatoires
qui ont provoqué de plusieurs pannes.
Nous avons travaillé avec les équipes de
Cisco et nous avons trouvé l'origine du
probleme. Dans la version 5.2.X Cisco a
ajouté de nouvelles fonctionalités sur
les vlan. Ainsi un vlan peut être de
2 types differents. Lors de la mise à jour
vers 5.2.1 il faut effectuer l'upgrade en
passant par une version special qui fixe
le type de vlan. Sinon, le type de vlan
n'est pas fixé et il est inconnu.
Pour fixer:
il faut faire un
no vlan XX,XX,XX
puis reappliquer la configuration de vlan
vlan XX,XX,XX
Update(s):
Date: 2012-10-15 23:20:10 UTC 64 bytes from 172.16.XX.1: icmp_seq=59. time=0.334 ms
64 bytes from 172.16.XX.1: icmp_seq=60. time=0.433 ms
64 bytes from 172.16.XX.1: icmp_seq=66. time=0.371 ms
64 bytes from 172.16.XX.1: icmp_seq=67. time=0.344 ms
64 bytes from 172.16.XX.1: icmp_seq=68. time=0.484 ms
64 bytes from 172.16.XX.1: icmp_seq=69. time=0.337 ms
64 bytes from 172.16.XX.1: icmp_seq=70. time=0.721 ms
^C
----172.16.XX.1 PING Statistics----
95 packets transmitted, 90 packets received, 5% packet loss
round-trip (ms) min/avg/max/stddev = 0.228/0.6535/6.17/0.866
pcc-19-n5 fait.
Nous n'avons constanté aucun impact sur la production de pcc.
Tous les vlans de production des switchs de stockage de pcc ont
été corrigés du bug concernés. Nous allons effectuer ces corrections
sur le vlans de maintenance dans la journée de demain.
Date: 2012-10-15 23:13:13 UTC 64 bytes from 172.16.XX.1: icmp_seq=11. time=0.307 ms
64 bytes from 172.16.XX.1: icmp_seq=12. time=0.361 ms
64 bytes from 172.16.XX.1: icmp_seq=18. time=0.299 ms
64 bytes from 172.16.XX.1: icmp_seq=19. time=0.345 ms
64 bytes from 172.16.XX.1: icmp_seq=20. time=0.960 ms
^C
----172.16.XX.1 PING Statistics----
21 packets transmitted, 16 packets received, 23% packet loss
round-trip (ms) min/avg/max/stddev = 0.299/0.4337/0.960/0.182
pcc-118-n5 fait.
Le dernier switch pcc: pcc-119-n5
Date: 2012-10-15 23:10:13 UTC 64 bytes from 172.20.XX.1: icmp_seq=13. time=0.341 ms
64 bytes from 172.20.XX.1: icmp_seq=14. time=0.616 ms
64 bytes from 172.20.XX.1: icmp_seq=31. time=0.312 ms
64 bytes from 172.20.XX.1: icmp_seq=32. time=0.299 ms
^C
----172.20.XX.1 PING Statistics----
33 packets transmitted, 17 packets received, 48% packet loss
round-trip (ms) min/avg/max/stddev = 0.299/0.4072/0.616/0.109
pcc-113-n5 fait.
Le suivant: pcc-118-n5
Date: 2012-10-15 23:04:32 UTC 64 bytes from 172.19.XXX.1: icmp_seq=54. time=0.312 ms
64 bytes from 172.19.XXX.1: icmp_seq=66. time=0.414 ms
64 bytes from 172.19.XXX.1: icmp_seq=67. time=0.304 ms
64 bytes from 172.19.XXX.1: icmp_seq=68. time=0.273 ms
64 bytes from 172.19.XXX.1: icmp_seq=69. time=0.310 ms
64 bytes from 172.19.XXX.1: icmp_seq=70. time=0.337 ms
64 bytes from 172.19.XXX.1: icmp_seq=71. time=0.321 ms
^C
----172.19.XXX.1 PING Statistics----
72 packets transmitted, 61 packets received, 15% packet loss
round-trip (ms) min/avg/max/stddev = 0.273/0.3487/0.879/0.0768
pcc-112-n5 fait.
Le suivant: pcc-113-n5
Date: 2012-10-15 23:01:07 UTC 64 bytes from 172.19.XXX.1: icmp_seq=97. time=0.320 ms
64 bytes from 172.19.XXX.1: icmp_seq=98. time=0.339 ms
64 bytes from 172.19.XXX.1: icmp_seq=115. time=0.321 ms
64 bytes from 172.19.XXX.1: icmp_seq=116. time=0.310 ms
^C
----172.19.XXX.1 PING Statistics----
117 packets transmitted, 101 packets received, 13% packet loss
round-trip (ms) min/avg/max/stddev = 0.278/0.33181/0.538/0.04253
pcc-107-n5 fait.
Le suivant: pcc-112-n5
Date: 2012-10-15 22:51:54 UTC 64 bytes from 172.19.XX.1: icmp_seq=215. time=0.330 ms
64 bytes from 172.19.XX.1: icmp_seq=216. time=0.341 ms
64 bytes from 172.19.XX.1: icmp_seq=217. time=0.320 ms
64 bytes from 172.19.XX.1: icmp_seq=226. time=0.709 ms
64 bytes from 172.19.XX.1: icmp_seq=227. time=0.347 ms
64 bytes from 172.19.XX.1: icmp_seq=228. time=0.335 ms
64 bytes from 172.19.XX.1: icmp_seq=229. time=0.365 ms
^C
----172.19.XX.1 PING Statistics----
230 packets transmitted, 222 packets received, 3% packet loss
round-trip (ms) min/avg/max/stddev = 0.256/0.37774/1.37/0.1168
pcc-105-n5 fait.
Le suivant: pcc-107-n5
Date: 2012-10-15 22:43:57 UTC 64 bytes from 172.18.XX.1: icmp_seq=277. time=0.515 ms
64 bytes from 172.18.XX.1: icmp_seq=278. time=0.416 ms
64 bytes from 172.18.XX.1: icmp_seq=279. time=0.377 ms
64 bytes from 172.18.XX.1: icmp_seq=280. time=0.404 ms
64 bytes from 172.18.XX.1: icmp_seq=292. time=0.360 ms
64 bytes from 172.18.XX.1: icmp_seq=293. time=0.356 ms
64 bytes from 172.18.XX.1: icmp_seq=294. time=0.291 ms
64 bytes from 172.18.XX.1: icmp_seq=295. time=0.326 ms
^C
----172.18.XX.1 PING Statistics----
296 packets transmitted, 285 packets received, 3% packet loss
round-trip (ms) min/avg/max/stddev = 0.272/0.45126/2.74/0.2082
pcc-104-n5 fait.
Le suivant: pcc-105-n5
Date: 2012-10-15 22:39:01 UTC Nous commencons avec pcc-104-n5.
Date: 2012-10-15 20:24:04 UTC il reste les N5 de stockage de pCC
que nous allons faire cette nuit.
puis:
rps, backup, 3 couples de N5 stockage-15,27,31
qu'on fera demain matin avec toutes l'équipe
de stockage.
Date: 2012-10-15 20:19:21 UTC 178.33.122.248/24 fait
Date: 2012-10-15 19:52:25 UTC 188.165.14.0/24 fait
Date: 2012-10-15 18:36:14 UTC 188.165.15.0/24 fait